It is a rugby league column. I’ve been laying aside penning this specific installment for a few months now as a result of it’s about many issues however solely tangentially about rugby league.
In my procrastination, I hoped another person would write it. I haven’t seen anybody achieve this. I then hoped the difficulty would quietly die a demise in order that what I needed to say could be irrelevant. That hasn’t occurred.
What I’ve to say is about Israel Folau and it received’t take lengthy. It’s quite simple.
As I perceive it, Folau stated that – amongst different teams – homosexuals will go to Hell.
My instantly thought upon studying this was maybe totally different to yours: I assumed, “How ridiculous, there isn’t a such place as Hell!”
There’s – after all, proper? – no God. Not more than there’s a tooth fairy.
What he stated was akin to “Should you’re homosexual, the Boogie Man will get you.” Or for those who’re a drunk, Wile E Coyote will chase you down and eat you.
Preposterous. Too foolish for phrases.
However I do have a barely larger level to make right here than ‘I need to infuriate our Christian readers’. I recognise and settle for that Folau’s feedback may have a dangerous impression on younger individuals combating their identities.
I agree the Rugby AU have been inside their rights to terminate his employment. We dwell in a world the place a sports activities governing physique, the NRL, campaigned aggressively in favour of the legalisation of homosexual marriage.
Folau’s feedback have the capability for actual hurt however they’re additionally what is understood within the company world as ‘dangerous optics’. Very dangerous.
So would a sports activities governing physique sack me primarily based on the opening few paragraphs right here? Effectively, I haven’t vilified anybody, I haven’t referred to as Christians silly or deluded. I’ve simply expressed one thing I regard as a blatant reality.
So I hope they wouldn’t. However perhaps they might, as a result of my reality has the capability to offend lots of potential clients. So it’s commercially dangerous.
How large a component in these choices is business hurt, and the way large a fraction of that half is acutely aware or unconscious on the a part of these doing the deciding?
My still-wider statement is that now we have spent millennia reshaping our understanding of historical superstition to swimsuit our present societal norms, conveniently ignoring uncomfortable truths. There must be a breaking level.
To me, essentially the most attention-grabbing side of this entire imbroglio has nothing to do with sport. Folau appears to signify, if not a breaking level, a signpost marking the place the breaking level may be.
Amongst a few of the teachings within the Bible, in keeping with a number of interpretations, are grasp has the best to mistreat slaves in a perverse approach, promoting your daughter is cool, cannibalism and incest are regular in some circumstances, disabled persons are banned from church, consuming and killing youngsters can be justifiable and plenty of, many different BC-based horrors.
As a result of we appear to suppose we want faith for one thing or different, we flip a blind eye to those savage teachings.
Folau has reminded us they’re there. As an alternative of going through as much as the contradictions he has highlighted, now we have chosen to proceed deluding ourselves that imagined sorcery from 2000 years in the past and a contemporary, inclusive and progressive society are appropriate.
They aren’t. As a species, we’ll sooner or later have selected between them. I’d prefer to suppose the countdown to that day ticked down a second or two in current months in regard to this trivial little sports activities controversy.