Musk’s new lawyer fights ‘pedo man’ defamation lawsuit claims, questions motive

SpaceX and Tesla CEO Elon Musk’s lawyer argued Tuesday in a courtroom submitting that the British cave diver who turned embroiled in a public spat along with his consumer and later sued for defamation can’t get well damages as a result of his repute was not harmed. In courtroom paperwork filed Tuesday, Musk’s new lawyer Alex Spiro of Quinn Emmanuel questioned the motive of Vernon Unsworth, the British cave diver, who filed a defamation lawsuit in September 2018 within the U.S. District Court docket for the Central District of California. The swimsuit was filed after Musk known as him a “pedo man” and made different statements insinuating he was a pedophile in a public assault on Twitter. The struggle erupted final summer season after the rescue of youth soccer gamers trapped in a collapse Thailand. Musk denies the allegations of defamation within the newest response. Spiro turned Musk’s lawyer earlier this month. “One has to query Mr. Unsworth’s motive in turning this right into a federal case,” Spiro wrote in a response to Unsworth’s grievance. “The libel legal guidelines exist to guard these whose reputations have been harmed by false assertions of reality. Within the case of Mr. Unsworth, who made himself a public determine, these assertions must be made with constitutional malice. Mr. Musk has already retracted what he stated publicly. Mr. Unsworth’s declare is thus confined to what Mr. Musk stated in personal dialog. Regardless, Mr. Unsworth and his repute are not any worse off.” Musk’s lawyer argues that Unsworth was motivated by a “need to take advantage of the media protection over what he instigated to reap a monetary windfall from Mr. Musk, regardless of the absence of any damage.” Musk will struggle that, Spiro wrote. U.S. District Choose Stephen V. Wilson lately denied a movement to dismiss the case and as an alternative scheduled a date for trial. The trial is scheduled to start October 22. The choice implies that Unsworth’s case is powerful sufficient to go to trial. Musk’s legal professionals argued that statements on the web, and extra particularly on unmoderated boards like Twitter, are presumptively opinion, not goal reality. Defamation legislation doesn’t apply to opinions or insults. However Wilson rejected Musk’s argument, partly due to an e-mail interplay he had with BuzzFeed reporter Ryan Mac. The lawsuit alleges that between July 15 and August 30, Musk periodically used Twitter and emails to the media to publish false and defamatory accusations towards Unsworth, together with accusations of pedophilia and baby rape. The preliminary “pedo man” assault got here after Unsworth gave a crucial interview to the media saying Musk’s mini sub “had completely no probability of working.” The diving professional ended an interview section by suggesting Musk ought to “stick his submarine the place it hurts.”