Are the rule modifications resulting in increased scoring?

October 11, 2018 marked a big second for the AFL. It was the day that 9 rule modifications had been introduced. They had been designed to encourage excessive scoring and one-on-one soccer as a substitute of staff defence, which has crept into trendy soccer during the last 15 years. The AFL needed to do one thing to vary the sport. Many of the matches in 2018 had been attritional battles that centered approach an excessive amount of on the centre of the bottom and never sufficient on one-on-one contests between the arcs. It wasn’t unusual to see video games morph into rugby scrums that had been ugly and low scoring. And on nearer evaluation, the scoring drop from 2017 to 2018 was a trigger for concern. The common rating in 2017 was 89 factors per staff. In 2018 that dropped to 83 factors a sport. That’s an enormous drop of six factors. What brought on that? Was it the coaches utilizing defensive techniques so that they weren’t being opened up? Have been runners getting used to assist inexperienced groups not panic throughout video games and to stay to constructions? The AFL determined that large modifications wanted to occur. So when Steve Hocking got here out final yr and carried out all these guidelines, it was seen as a optimistic information story. There was meant to be more room within the ahead line and midfielders may break free from congestion simpler. However alas, that has not occurred. Video games have regarded higher visually, however scoring has not improved. Over the primary eight rounds of this season, we now have seen a pointy drop in scoring averages, dipping to 80 factors a sport in comparison with 83 final yr. When was the final time 80 factors was the common over a season? The yr was 1967. That was again when it was a 12-team competitors and there weren’t any interstate golf equipment. Steve Hocking’s drastic modifications have failed to enhance scoring. (Picture by Scott Barbour/AFL Media/Getty Photos) Right here’s a breakdown of all of the scores from the primary eight rounds of final season. Zero-50 factors (10 events) 51-60 (15) 61-70 (17) 71-80 (21) 81-90 (24) 91-99 (16) 100-109 (21) 110-119 (12) 120-129 (5) 130-139 (2) 140-149 (1) 150 plus (Zero) And right here’s how 2019 has regarded up to now. Zero-50 factors (7) 51-60 (18) 61-70 (26) 71-80 (26) 81-90 (24) 91-99 (12) 100-109 (13) 110-119 (10) 120-129 (5) 130-139 (1) 140-149 (1) 150 plus (Zero) The Spherical three sport between Melbourne and Essendon was the one event the place each groups scored 100 or above in the identical sport. So what to make of those statistics? The largest concern is the scoring vary between Zero and 80 factors. It has jumped from 43.7 per cent in 2018 to 53.four per cent this yr. That could be a 10 per cent enhance within the area of 1 season. It additionally signifies that lower than half of scores this season have been above 80 factors. That could be a scary quantity and one thing the AFL must be involved about. Positive, the video games look higher on TV, however do we actually need to see video games being determined by 62-74 rating traces every week? One other determine that raises my eyebrows is the drop-off in scores above 100 factors. In 2018 it occurred 28 per cent of the time. This season that determine has dipped to 21 per cent. Extra AFL Are the rule modifications resulting in increased scoring? I would slightly watch Carlton work exhausting than Collingwood coast AFL prime 100: Shaun Grigg Rampe issued two fines for Friday evening incidents Shaun Grigg publicizes shock quick retirement from AFL AFL Don’t we need to see high-scoring matches the place video games open up after half time? I’m sick of individuals saying that the sport is in fine condition. The VFL/AFL was at its peak when blokes had been kicking 100 targets a season and groups kicked 15-18 targets per sport. This stat will scare lots of footy fanatics, however there hasn’t been one rating above 145 factors this season up to now. If we need to appeal to folks to the footy, we want increased scores. I don’t understand how the AFL can clear up this subject. The sport is analysed to dying and one of many methods they might repair the scoring points is to cease messing with the interpretations and the principles. Deliver the soccer again to fundamentals. If the AFL checked out tapes of video games 20 years in the past they'd realise how a lot better the spectacle was, and though defensively the game wasn’t on the stage is now, do we actually need it to be? Isn’t it higher if we see numerous targets as a substitute of a chess sport?